Polio eradication action with informed and engaged societies

After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. 

Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future. 

On the transfer, co-founder Victoria Martin expressed her pleasure to see this work continue under Wits' leadership, knowing that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction. 

As Wits, we honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades and look forward building from that strong base. This includes co-founders Warren Feek (1953-2024) and Victoria Martin as well as La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA), which continues independently at lainiciativadecomunicacion.com with links to The CI Global site. We are also eager to forge new partnerships and entertain new ideas as we consider how best to contribute to social and behaviour change in our rapidly evolving environment.

If you are joining the International Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) Summit in Panama, please join Wits and CILA on Monday, 22 June, to share your thoughts and suggestion for the relaunch of the Communication Initiative. We will be in Pacifica 5 from 12-1:25 for the Refuel, Reflect, and Renew Lunch Series: The Communication Initiative: celebrating a driving force for Communication for Social Change and the way forward. We will reflect on the legacy of Warren Feek and family in creating the Communication Initiative, consider the contributions of CI over the years and then turn our attention towards the future in this dynamic session. 

If you are unable to join us in Panama, we still want to hear from you. Please contribute your thoughts by following this link: https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026 or reaching out to ci_surveys@commint.com

You can also follow the QR Code:

 https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026

Time to read
2 minutes
Read so far

Adolescents Trust Physicians for Vaccine Information More than Their Parents or Religious Leaders

0 comments
Affiliation

Schreiber High School (D.S. Griffin); Columbia University Medical Center (Muhlbauer, D.O. Griffin)

Date
Summary

"Adolescent-centered education from physicians has the potential to influence vaccination acceptance."

Conducted in the United States (US), this study focused on the attitudes of adolescents with regard to the importance, safety, and effectiveness of vaccination, and on their most trusted source for information about vaccines. In the region studied, the vaccination rate in adolescents exceeds national averages (e.g., 91.1% of teens received the tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap), and 89.2% received the meningitis vaccine). However, in the US, increasing rates of exemptions from vaccination are threatening to allow (and are already resulting in) the re-emergence of many vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs).

Research has shown that improving vaccination rates of adolescents before they enter adulthood is vital, because it is a time of development during which effective preventative care measures, such as timely vaccinations, could establish lifelong healthy behaviours. Interventions, including communication-centred ones, at this age could also influence the vaccination decisions adolescents will make when they move into the role of parents.

The researchers conducted a cross-sectional survey of public high school students (ages 14-18) in Long Island, New York, US. using a paper-based questionnaire. A total of 105 completed questionnaires were returned.

Key findings:

  • A majority of the participants had favourable views of vaccinations, with over half of the sample agreeing strongly (58%) with the statement "I think it is important for everyone to get the recommended vaccines for themselves and their children." Of those responding to the statement "If I ever have children, I will want them to get all the recommended vaccinations," 62% strongly agreed.
  • A little over half (56%) of participants reported that they felt sufficiently informed about vaccines and their safety.
  • A little less than two-thirds of participants disagreed or strongly disagreed with the statement "Rare diseases like measles, diphtheria, and polio are not common where I live, so those vaccines are not necessary." In response to "I would make a different choice about vaccinating my own children than my parents have made for me," the majority disagreed.
  • Almost half (47%) of adolescents reported family physicians or other medical professionals as their primary source of vaccine information, followed by their parents/guardians (38%).
  • The most trusted source of information about vaccines was family physician or other medical profession, while the least trusted source was social media.
  • Adolescents were divided on the issue of vaccine safety, which may suggest that concern over the possible side effects of vaccines is a potential driver of vaccine hesitancy among this group.

According to the researchers, these results underscore the importance of healthcare provider-based interventions designed to reach adolescents with information and education, as well as the need to develop strategies for addressing vaccine hesitancy, to help raise immunisation rates among adolescents.

More specifically, strategies to that focus on educating teenagers about the relative safety of vaccines might benefit the adolescent population. Additional research could explore how adolescents perceive vaccine safety. The fact that under half of respondents in this study either did not feel adequately informed about vaccine safety, or did not have an opinion, invites the possibility that educational efforts have not focused on the distinct but perhaps critical issue of vaccine safety. Considering that so may adolescents seem willing to embrace vaccination as an approach to prevent diseases despite their being equally divided with regard to safety concerns may suggest that focus on accentuating potential benefits would be more persuasive than attempts to minimise perceptions of risk. Further investigation could clarify these questions.

In conclusion, future studies assessing the impact of increased engagement with adolescents and physician education of adolescents about vaccines may help expand our understanding of barriers to adolescent vaccination.

Source