Polio eradication action with informed and engaged societies

After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. 

Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future. 

On the transfer, co-founder Victoria Martin expressed her pleasure to see this work continue under Wits' leadership, knowing that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction. 

As Wits, we honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades and look forward building from that strong base. This includes co-founders Warren Feek (1953-2024) and Victoria Martin as well as La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA), which continues independently at lainiciativadecomunicacion.com with links to The CI Global site. We are also eager to forge new partnerships and entertain new ideas as we consider how best to contribute to social and behaviour change in our rapidly evolving environment.

If you are joining the International Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) Summit in Panama, please join Wits and CILA on Monday, 22 June, to share your thoughts and suggestion for the relaunch of the Communication Initiative. We will be in Pacifica 5 from 12-1:25 for the Refuel, Reflect, and Renew Lunch Series: The Communication Initiative: celebrating a driving force for Communication for Social Change and the way forward. We will reflect on the legacy of Warren Feek and family in creating the Communication Initiative, consider the contributions of CI over the years and then turn our attention towards the future in this dynamic session. 

If you are unable to join us in Panama, we still want to hear from you. Please contribute your thoughts by following this link: https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026 or reaching out to ci_surveys@commint.com

You can also follow the QR Code:

 https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026

Time to read
2 minutes
Read so far

Approaches to Vaccination Among Populations in Areas of Conflict

0 comments
Affiliation

Centers for Disease Prevention and Control, or CDC (Nnadi, Ohuabunwo, wa Nganda, Esapa, Bolu, Mahoney, Vertefeuille, Wiesen); National Primary Health Care Development Agency (Etsano); Africa Field Epidemiology and Training Network Nigeria Country Office (Uba, Melton)

Date
Summary

Without developing and refining approaches to reach and vaccinate children and other vulnerable populations in areas of conflict or insecurity, polio and other vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs) may persist in these settings and spread across subnational and international borders. This article examines key strategic and operational tactics that have led to increased polio vaccination coverage among populations in Nigeria, Somalia, and Pakistan, and how these could be applied to reach and vaccinate populations in other conflict settings across the world.

Experience indicates that, with a good understanding of the nuances of the conflict and a great deal of operational flexibility, reaching and immunising eligible populations in these settings may continue to be viable. Key strategies that have been used in the polio eradication programme include:

  • Security assessments are core to planning and safe implementation of field activities. Incorporating local knowledge and information networks in security assessments is critical.
  • Negotiations with key actors in a conflict, including state and nonstate actors and their allies, can be critical. For example, in Somalia, putative governments and insurgent nonstate actors have allowed indirect access to populations by trusted individuals or organisations for purposes of providing immunisation and other healthcare services in these settings.
  • Close community engagement in the form of advocacy with local traditional and religious leaders, information sharing with communities, the training of local residents as vaccinators, and community mobilisation networks supported by community "gatekeepers" may help shed light on the felt needs of the communities and build trust between the community and the vaccination programme. Finding solutions to some of these needs, including working with other development partner agencies, may be key to gaining trust, interest, and access to the community. In northern Nigeria, the Volunteer Community Mobilizer programme, a focused initiative that recruited and trained local community women as social mobilisers and vaccination workers, is considered to have bolstered participation in house-to-house polio and other routine immunisation programmes, especially in security-compromised and hard-to-reach communities.
  • Use of high-resolution Geographic Information Systems (GIS) technology can guide decision-making in inaccessible areas. In Nigeria, the use of satellite imagery is being employed to develop a greater understanding of potentially eligible populations living in areas currently inaccessible to polio vaccination workers.
  • Coordination with other humanitarian relief activities may be key to improving immunisation coverage and efficient use of public health resources. In many settings, closely coordinating delivery of medicines, food, and clothing with vaccine delivery has helped improve vaccine reach in communities.
  • Flexibility around vaccine scheduling and dosing options is important, considering that multiple birth cohorts may have missed age-appropriate vaccines.

A number of operational approaches may be available for safe delivery of vaccines to populations in conflict settings. Key strategies that have been used in the polio eradication programme include: offering opportunistic vaccination during days of tranquility, establishing barrier vaccination zones, collaborating with military and other security personnel, establishing permanent vaccination teams, strengthening vaccination activities at transit and border-crossing sites, and vaccinating at camps for refugee and internally displaced persons (IDPs) and other sites of mass gathering. As an example of the latter strategy, religious institutions, including mosques, temples, churches, and other places of worship, and traditional or cultural gatherings have served as useful access points to populations cut off from sites for vaccine delivery in conflict settings.

In conclusion: "Given the upward trend in the number of fragile nation states and the rising proportion of the global population projected to live in settings experiencing violent conflicts around the world..., understanding and refining approaches to support continued vaccine delivery and disease surveillance in these settings may be of substantial value to the global VPDs control efforts."

Source

The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Volume 216, Issue suppl_1, 1 July 2017, Pages S368-S372, https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jix175 Image credit: Reuters