Polio eradication action with informed and engaged societies

After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. 

Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future. 

On the transfer, co-founder Victoria Martin expressed her pleasure to see this work continue under Wits' leadership, knowing that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction. 

As Wits, we honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades and look forward building from that strong base. This includes co-founders Warren Feek (1953-2024) and Victoria Martin as well as La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA), which continues independently at lainiciativadecomunicacion.com with links to The CI Global site. We are also eager to forge new partnerships and entertain new ideas as we consider how best to contribute to social and behaviour change in our rapidly evolving environment.

If you are joining the International Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) Summit in Panama, please join Wits and CILA on Monday, 22 June, to share your thoughts and suggestion for the relaunch of the Communication Initiative. We will be in Pacifica 5 from 12-1:25 for the Refuel, Reflect, and Renew Lunch Series: The Communication Initiative: celebrating a driving force for Communication for Social Change and the way forward. We will reflect on the legacy of Warren Feek and family in creating the Communication Initiative, consider the contributions of CI over the years and then turn our attention towards the future in this dynamic session. 

If you are unable to join us in Panama, we still want to hear from you. Please contribute your thoughts by following this link: https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026 or reaching out to ci_surveys@commint.com

You can also follow the QR Code:

 https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026

Time to read
2 minutes
Read so far

Caregiver Perceptions of the Broader Societal Benefits of Vaccination: A Path toward Sustainable Vaccine Advocacy in India

0 comments
Affiliation

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (Dhaliwal, Shet); Bal Umang Drishya Sanstha (Rattani, Chandrashekhar, Seth); Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health (Bloom)

Date
Summary

"Investigating the experiences and perspectives of caregivers qualitatively, particularly in settings with low vaccine uptake, provides a unique understanding of specific social values that caregivers associate with vaccination programs."

Growing public health evidence suggests that, in addition to health-related benefits, there are also social and economic benefits of vaccination. This study used qualitative research to understand how caregivers in Mewat District, Haryana, an area in India with low vaccination coverage, perceive these social and economic benefits, and whether these benefits factor into their vaccination decisions for their children.

Between September and November 2020, the researchers conducted in-depth interviews with 11 mothers, 1 father and 1 grandmother of children in the Ghasera village of Mewat. The themes that emerged include:

  • Caregivers associate positive health outcomes with vaccination programmes, as well as some additional social and economic benefits: Most participants believed that vaccination prevents their children from contracting specific diseases, such as polio. Vaccination programmes in the community were also credited with improved community knowledge of diseases and the specific diseases vaccines prevent, with vaccinators who go door to door also offering general guidance on maintaining health. Participants also noted that their children are provided with education services at vaccination centres, learning counting and reading skills, receiving nutrition information, and developing essential social interaction skills with other children.
  • Caregivers credit local advocacy and familial support as playing a role in their ability to decide to utilise vaccination programmes for children: For example, when other members of the community, such as neighbours and teachers, accept and encourage vaccination, others become more likely to take their children to receive vaccines.
  • Caregivers perceive gaps in vaccination programmes that negatively impact their perceptions of vaccines and healthcare workers: In addition to logistical challenges, some participants said they feel vaccinators do not provide detailed information on the benefits of vaccination, instead expecting caregivers to simply vaccinate their child. Female participants felt that the responsibility of getting their child vaccinated, and caring for the child after they were vaccinated, rested with them.

The data point to the importance of designing effective communication strategies about vaccination programmes, identifying local advocates, and using context-specific language to communicate benefits to caregivers. Designing communication strategies with local champions may produce long-term advocates within the community who understand the importance of vaccination programmes and the full benefits of vaccines may enable the creation of effective advocacy strategies. Context-specific advocacy strategies could be leveraged to bring further social and economic benefits of vaccination programmes to the attention of caregivers. For example, as many residents in rural communities, such as Mewat, are daily wage earners, training local advocates to discuss long-term economic costs associated with missed vaccination may motivate uptake.

In conclusion: "Qualitatively exploring the perceived benefits provides a unique understanding of the value that caregivers assign to vaccination and complements existing knowledge on factors that dissuade caregivers from vaccination. These insights will allow researchers to better identify and design context-specific advocacy strategies to strengthen vaccination programs in communities with low vaccine uptake and acceptance."

Source

SSM - Qualitative Research in Health 2 (2022) 100156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100156. Image credit: © Photo: World Bank / Curt Carnemark via Flickr (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)