Polio eradication action with informed and engaged societies

After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. 

Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future. 

On the transfer, co-founder Victoria Martin expressed her pleasure to see this work continue under Wits' leadership, knowing that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction. 

As Wits, we honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades and look forward building from that strong base. This includes co-founders Warren Feek (1953-2024) and Victoria Martin as well as La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA), which continues independently at lainiciativadecomunicacion.com with links to The CI Global site. We are also eager to forge new partnerships and entertain new ideas as we consider how best to contribute to social and behaviour change in our rapidly evolving environment.

If you are joining the International Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) Summit in Panama, please join Wits and CILA on Monday, 22 June, to share your thoughts and suggestion for the relaunch of the Communication Initiative. We will be in Pacifica 5 from 12-1:25 for the Refuel, Reflect, and Renew Lunch Series: The Communication Initiative: celebrating a driving force for Communication for Social Change and the way forward. We will reflect on the legacy of Warren Feek and family in creating the Communication Initiative, consider the contributions of CI over the years and then turn our attention towards the future in this dynamic session. 

If you are unable to join us in Panama, we still want to hear from you. Please contribute your thoughts by following this link: https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026 or reaching out to ci_surveys@commint.com

You can also follow the QR Code:

 https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026

Time to read
3 minutes
Read so far

Improving Immunisation Coverage and Equity through the Effective Use of Geospatial Technologies: A Landscape Analysis and Theory of Change

0 comments
Affiliation

HealthEnabled

Date
Summary

"In the context of the Covid-19 pandemic, the accelerated development of tools for data sharing and collaboration between remote locations using the common language of geography is more important than ever to advance the delivery of immunisation services."

Geospatial technologies, including global navigation satellite systems (GNSS), geographic information systems (GIS) and remote sensing, are tools for facilitating immunisation programme implementation through the visualisation and analytical power of maps, geospatial analysis, and modelling. This report provides an overview of lessons learned and recommendations for the use of geospatial data and technologies to improve immunisation coverage and equity in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). It is the result of a collaborative effort on the part of Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, and the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) to evaluate and invest in the potential for digital innovations to improve global immunisation programmes.

The HealthEnabled researchers conducted a rapid review of published studies, research, and literature to examine the use of geospatial technologies for immunisation programming in LMICs; 38 publications were included. Overall, the studies demonstrate how the visualisation of geospatial data, spatial analysis, and geospatial modelling can help service delivery teams identify zero-dose children (children who have never been immunised) and improve service delivery to achieve equity in vaccine coverage. For example, programmes that have implemented real-time tracking of vaccinator teams see improvements in attendance at immunisation campaigns and the ability to ensure that all assigned catchment areas are covered, resulting in a reduced number of missed settlements.

Based on the review and on key informant interviews conducted as part of the landscape analysis, the report identifies 8 use cases where geospatial technologies have the greatest potential to shape immunisation outcomes: health system mapping, population estimation/spatial distribution, microplanning, disease surveillance, vaccinator tracking, campaign monitoring, geographic accessibility modelling, and vaccination coverage modelling. For each use case, the report outlines how technology can improve immunisation outcomes, what elements are needed, the main challenges, and the evidence/resource base. As noted here: "The most revolutionary application of geospatial data and technologies in immunisation planning will come from a change in how managers think about maps. Many stakeholders still think of a map as a paper-based resource, a static representation of a single point in time. The power of geospatial technology comes when multiple layers of data are combined with the element of time to transform a paper map into a whole new category of decision-making tools."

In order to understand how the use cases come together to geo-enable programmes for immunisation delivery, the report examines in-country implementation at national and sub-national levels, drawing on experiences in Nigeria, Myanmar, and Cameroon. Lessons learned in these and other contexts are outlined, such as the the fact that the focus of any initiative to use geospatial technologies must be on the people, underlying systems, and programme priorities, not on the technology itself. For instance, in systems where immunisation rates have been artificially inflated to maintain performance targets, a mobility tracking system may seem like a punishment or may reveal more information than staff are ready to face. Such lessons and challenges "highlight the need for a clear enabling environment that covers aspects such as governance and leadership, policies, data specifications and protocols, technical capacities and resources to support the sustainable use of geography as a unifying dimension in a national health information system (HIS)."

These foundations form the basis for a theory of change for the use of geospatial technologies for immunisation programming, found on page 33 of the report.

In conclusion, the following recommendations are offered:

  1. "Prioritise building foundations for a sustainable geo-enabled immunisation information system, including national governance, policies, resource allocation, capacity building and proper data management practices;
  2. Invest in and promote the strengthening of in-country technical expertise in the management and use of geospatial data and technologies through collaboration with regional partners, local universities and research centres, integrated training and local capacity building for all donor-funded applications;
  3. Promote the use of the appropriate geospatial technologies and tool platforms, including open-source solutions, for the management, visualization, analysis, modelling and sharing of geospatial data within and across sectors in support of immunisation programmes;
  4. Address data privacy and security issues when using geospatial data and technologies in-line with global best practices and national policies;
  5. Promote the use of geospatial data and technologies and the products they generate as advocacy tools for decision-makers to see the potential of a geo-enabled immunisation information system;
  6. When assessing the impact of geospatial technologies on immunisation programmes, adopt an impact framework not limited to coverage outcomes but rather a comprehensive analysis of the variety of pathways to change, including accountability, accessibility, equity, cost-benefit/cost-effectiveness and efficiency;
  7. Document and share program experiences and lessons learned to promote the expanded use of geospatial data and technologies for immunisation programming."

Click here for the report in French (49 pages, PDF).

Source

Gavi website, January 12 2022. Image credit: Frank Salet