Polio eradication action with informed and engaged societies
After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future.
 
Co-founder Victoria Martin is pleased to see this work continue under Wits' leadership. Victoria knows that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction.
 
We honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades. Meanwhile, La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA) continues independently at cila.comminitcila.com and is linked with The CI Global site.
Time to read
3 minutes
Read so far

Reasoned Action

11 comments
Theory Summary
1. "...there is one primary determinant of behavior, namely the person's intention to perform it. This intention is itself viewed as a function of two determinants
  • the person's attitude toward performing the behavior (based on his/her beliefs about the consequences of performing the behavior, i.e. his or her beliefs about the costs and benefits of performing the behavior), and
  • the person's perception of the social (or normative) pressure exerted upon him or her to perform the behavior."
2. This theory provides a framework to study attitudes toward behaviours. According to the theory, the most important determinant of a person's behaviour is behaviour intent. The individual's intention to perform a behaviour is a combination of attitude toward performing the behaviour and subjective norm. The individual's attitude toward the behaviour includes; Behavioural belief, evaluations of behavioural outcome, subjective norm, normative beliefs, and the motivation to comply.

If a person perceives that the outcome from performing a behaviour is positive, she/he will have a positive attitude torward performing that behaviour. The opposite can also be stated if the behaviour is thought to be negative. If relevant others see performing the behaviour as positive and the individual is motivated to meet the exceptions of relevant others, then a positive subjective norm is expected. If relevant others see the behaviour as negative, and the individual wants to meet the expectations of these "others", then the experience is likely to be a negative subjective norm for the individual. Attitudes and subjective norm are measured on scales (as an example the Likert Scale) using phrases or terms such as like/unlike, good/bad, and agree/disagree. The intent to perform a behaviour depends upon the product of the measures of attitude and subjective norm. A positive product indicates behavioural intent.

The Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) was developed in 1967. During the early 1970s the theory was revised and expanded by Ajzen and Fishbein. By 1980 the theory was used to study human behaviour and develop appropriate interventions.

3. The theory variables and their definitions, as described by Fishbein et al. (1994), are:

Behaviour: A specific behaviour defined by a combination of four components: action, target, context, and time (e.g., implementing a sexual HIV risk reduction strategy (action) by using condoms with commercial sex workers (target) in brothels (context) every time (time).

Intention: The intent to perform a behaviour is the best predictor that a desired behavior will actually occur. In order to measure it accurately and effectively, intent should be defined using the same components used to define behaviour: action, target, context, and time. Both attitude and norms, described below, influence one's intention to perform a behaviour.

Attitude: A person's positive or negative feelings toward performing the defined behaviour.
  • Behavioural Beliefs: Behavioural beliefs are a combination of a person's beliefs regarding the outcomes of a defined behavior and the person's evaluation of potential outcomes. These beliefs will differ from population to population. For instance, married heterosexuals may consider introducing condoms into their relationship an admission of infidelity, while for homosexual males in high prevalence areas it may be viewed as a sign of trust and caring.
Norms: A person's perception of other people's opinions regarding the defined behaviour.
  • Normative Beliefs: Normative beliefs are a combination of a person's beliefs regarding other people's views of a behaviour and the person's willingness to conform to those views. As with behavioural beliefs, normative beliefs regarding other people's opinions and the evaluation of those opinions will vary from population to population.
Sources:
1. Fishbein summarising Fishbein and Ajzen [1975], Ajzen and Fishbein [1980] Fishbein, Middlestadt and Hitchcock [1991], page 4 in "Developing Effective Behavior Change Interventions", Fishbein M, Univ Of Illinois
2.University of South Florida Community & Family Health site's overview.
3."Behaviour Change - A Summary of Four Major Theories" [PDF]

Comments

User Image
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 11/30/1999 - 00:00 Permalink

could provide more references on empirical research under each.
re I am searching for appropriate conceptual /theoretical framework to explain lukeworm adoption of insecticide treated mosquito nets in Uganda to guide MBA dissertation. chizestom @yahoo.com

User Image
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 11/30/1999 - 00:00 Permalink

I am preparing a research proposal for my Masters degree looking at the behaviour of people with diabetes on diagnosis - particularly what there educational needs might be. I am interested in how educational programmes and strategies might be better designed at this critical time to encourage lifelong learning for people with diabetes. Consideration of attitudes and beliefs is likely to be key to this. phil holdich, UK

User Image
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 11/30/1999 - 00:00 Permalink

not very useful as no examples of its use are given.

User Image
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 11/30/1999 - 00:00 Permalink

Not very I'm afraid

User Image
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 10/17/2004 - 16:36 Permalink

this page really helped me better understand the theory of reasoned action as I needed to fully understand if for my research paper..thanks

User Image
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 01/21/2005 - 15:36 Permalink

Brilliant just wot i woz looking for

User Image
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 03/23/2005 - 14:59 Permalink

I am working on a presentation about the Theory of Reasoned Action, and I think this article gives a good overview explaining in a clear way the most important aspects.

User Image
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 04/08/2005 - 04:00 Permalink

Short, but detailed information with some really useful terms.

User Image
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 06/12/2005 - 00:01 Permalink

The theory, more than the page, is very helpful in developing broad campaign strategies. Fear appeals embraced in many other change theories have not born as much fruit as theories that allow for more flexibility in the communication approach, such as the TRA. However, other communication / social theory need to fill out the open areas, such as message design, social networks, etc.

User Image
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 02/20/2007 - 08:27 Permalink

Printer-friendly page was not printer friendly. Right margin is off the page.

User Image
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 08/25/2004 - 13:32 Permalink

Asociacion Vivir tiene una nueva pagina web la direccion es avivir@avivir.org