Polio eradication action with informed and engaged societies
After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future.
 
Co-founder Victoria Martin is pleased to see this work continue under Wits' leadership. Victoria knows that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction.
 
We honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades. Meanwhile, La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA) continues independently at cila.comminitcila.com and is linked with The CI Global site.
Time to read
1 minute
Read so far

Comparison of the Fundamental Characteristics of Four Orientations

3 comments
Editor's note: While the following comparison has a focus on health issues, it may be applicable to any development issues.

SOURCE OF ACTION

Social Marketing (SM): Agency or organisation

Public Relations (PR): Agency or organisation

Advocacy: Community or collaborative

Negotiation: Individual or community agency or organisation

FOCUS

SM: Develops health messages to increase knowledge and model behaviours; enhances image of sponsoring organisation

PR: Develops messages and cultivates relationships in order to enhance the organisation's associations with key publics

Advocacy: setting the agenda; shaping the debate; advancing the policy; policies enacted to improve health

Negotiation: determining the agenda; building coalitions; influencing the policy; compliance-prone decisions to improve health

TARGET OF MEDIA EFFORTS

SM: Individuals with risk factors; general public

PR: Customers, clients, shareholders, and current funders; potential supporters and funders; general public

Advocacy: Power holders and policy makers; producers, marketers of health-affecting products; other advocates; general public

Negotiation: Stakeholders and decision-makers; professionals, producers, marketers of health-affecting products and services; social networks; general public - individuals

PERCEIVED NEED TO BE FILLED BY MEDIA STRATEGY

SM: Knowledge and behaviour deficit

PR: Knowledge and familiarity deficit

Advocacy: Power and resource deficit

Negotiation: Knowledge, power, and participatory behaviour deficit

METHOD

SM: Create an optimum blend of the 4P's of marketing in order to reduce the target audience's perceived barriers to accepting the product, while simultaneously making the product as appealing as possible. May utilise free or paid media.

PR: Cultivate relationships, project desired image, and maintain visible community involvement in order to promote ‘favorable associations' with key publics. Use ‘earned' news media and paid ads to gain exposure for organisation.

Advocacy: Utilise ‘earned' news media and paid ads, in conjunction with community organisation strategies, to put pressure on policy makers and to reframe public debate on an issue.

Negotiation: Identify decision-makers at all levels that can influence and be involved with helping the individuals to render their own decisions and build trusting relationships for future benefit. Promotes a healthy citizen responsible for her/his own actions.

MODE OF ACTION

SM: Can be used in isolation, or as part of larger efforts.

PR: Can be used alone, or as part of integrated communications efforts.

Advocacy: Used in combination with other community organisation and advocacy strategies.

Negotiation: Can be used alone, or as part of integrated communication efforts with community organisation and advocacy strategies.

LEVEL OF EFFECT

SM: Primarily individual

PR: Primarily individual

Advocacy: Primarily social environment

Negotiation: Individual to social environment and policy-makers
Source
From Scott Ratzan's presentation to CHANGE mini-forum, January 1999.

Comments

User Image
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 11/30/1999 - 00:00 Permalink

Somewhat vague --could be more helpful if concrete examples were given.

User Image
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 11/30/1999 - 00:00 Permalink

planning model in organisation

User Image
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 08/28/2005 - 05:00 Permalink

Again, this isn't that helpful in a vacuum. It's not a model itself, but a comparison of four different models, right?